The NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX or the G92 that was released on March 28 of 2008 was considered to be the fastest GeForce 9 GPU before the release of the GTX 100 and GTX 200 series along with Half of the price of the 8800 GTX. It was considered to be the next king after the release of the 8800 GTX, was considered to be powerful. It's specifications is that it had a Process size of 65nm, a Transistor count of 754 Million along with a Die Size of 324mm^2. The Clock speeds were 675 MHz for the GPU, 1.688 GHz for the Shader Clock, and 1.1GB (1100 MHz) and 2.2GBps effective. It had a Length of 267mm or 10.5 In, a Width of 111mm or 4.4 In, a Height of 38mm or 1.5 In with a TDP of 140W, PSU of 300W, and an Output of 2 DVIs and 1 S-Video. It has a GDDR3 Memory @ 512 MB with a 256 bit and a 70.40 GB/s. It had 128 SU, 64 TMUs, 16 ROPs and SMs, and an L2 Cache of 64 KB. It has a Theoretical Preformance of 10.80 GPixel/s, 43.20GTexel/s, and 432.1GFLOPS.
There was another Variant that was considered to be the First and Last GTX+, which was the 9800 GTX+. For the Test on Jaindike's video, It got around 40-45 FPS on Rocket League and Counter Strike: Global Offensive, and Over 100+ FPS on Minecraft along with 90-100 in Insurgency. [Dec '205912352351]
Whilst the drought in the GPU market continues, street prices for AMD cards are around 50% lower than comparable (based on headline average fps figures) Nvidia cards. Many experienced users simply have no interest in buying AMD cards, regardless of price. The combined market share for all of AMD’s RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers (Steam stats) is just 2.12% whilst Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5.03%. AMD’s Neanderthal marketing tactics seem to have come back to haunt them. Their brazen domination of social media platforms including youtube and reddit resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins and ignore the losses. Experienced gamers know all too well that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. [Jan '22GPUPro]
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.