The NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX or the G92 that was released on March 28 of 2008 was considered to be the fastest GeForce 9 GPU before the release of the GTX 100 and GTX 200 series along with Half of the price of the 8800 GTX. It was considered to be the next king after the release of the 8800 GTX, was considered to be powerful. It's specifications is that it had a Process size of 65nm, a Transistor count of 754 Million along with a Die Size of 324mm^2. The Clock speeds were 675 MHz for the GPU, 1.688 GHz for the Shader Clock, and 1.1GB (1100 MHz) and 2.2GBps effective. It had a Length of 267mm or 10.5 In, a Width of 111mm or 4.4 In, a Height of 38mm or 1.5 In with a TDP of 140W, PSU of 300W, and an Output of 2 DVIs and 1 S-Video. It has a GDDR3 Memory @ 512 MB with a 256 bit and a 70.40 GB/s. It had 128 SU, 64 TMUs, 16 ROPs and SMs, and an L2 Cache of 64 KB. It has a Theoretical Preformance of 10.80 GPixel/s, 43.20GTexel/s, and 432.1GFLOPS.
There was another Variant that was considered to be the First and Last GTX+, which was the 9800 GTX+. For the Test on Jaindike's video, It got around 40-45 FPS on Rocket League and Counter Strike: Global Offensive, and Over 100+ FPS on Minecraft along with 90-100 in Insurgency. [Dec '205912352351]
The RTX 4080 is based on Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture. It features 9,728 cores with base / boost clocks of 2.2 / 2.5 GHz, 16 GB of memory, a 256-bit memory bus, 76 3rd gen RT cores, 304 4th gen Tensor cores, DLSS 3 and a TDP of 320W. Performance gains will vary depending on the specific game and resolution. With a 4080 tier card 1080p in-game fps will often get CPU bottlenecked which prevents the GPU from delivering higher fps. At higher (often sub-optimal) resolutions (1440p, 4K etc) the 4080 will show increasing improvements compared to lesser cards. When fps are not CPU bottlenecked at all, such as during GPU benchmarks, the 4080 is around 50% faster than the 3080 and 25% faster than the 3090-Ti, these figures are approximate upper bounds for in-game fps improvements. The 4080 has an MSRP of $1,200 USD. Since PC gamers rarely buy AMD GPUs, Nvidia only have themselves to compete with. AMD continue to burn their credibility with PC gamers. Following a series of over-hyped releases which were heavily promoted on youtube, forums, reddit and twitter, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. As time goes on, AMD’s “Advanced Marketing” has a decreasing impact on consumers. Meanwhile, Nvidia remains focused on novel goals such as better graphics (RT/DLSS), frame consistency, game compatibility and driver stability. Consumers looking for better value should wait a few more months for the 4060 / 4070 models by which time AMD's 7900 series will also probably be heavily discounted. Alternatively, shoppers looking to buy in the near term should consider the last gen. 3060-Ti, which offers excellent real-world (1080p) performance at a fraction of the price ($400 USD). [Nov '22GPUPro]
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.