Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 265,561 user samples
261,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 139% EVGA(3842 3183)
Worst Bench: 116% Asus(1043 8736) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 116% Great: 139%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 713
4,053 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 133% XFX(1EAE 6710) ≥ 4GB
Poor bench: 124% XFX(1EAE 6710) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 124% Great: 133%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
131 % +1% 129 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
176 fps Better lighting effects.
+21%
145 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
181 fps Better reflection handling.
+28%
141 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
197 fps 254 fps Faster multi rendering.
+29%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
156 fps 157 fps +1%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
192 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+25%
153 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
242 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+59%
152 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
210 fps 265 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+26%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
166 fps 166 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,346,195 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.82 % Hugely higher market share.
+290%
0.21 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % Much more popular.
+32%
57 %
Age
Newest
61 Months 28+ Months Much more recent.
+54%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
202 fps 329 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+63%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
137 fps 230 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+68%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
180 fps 309 fps Much better texture detail.
+72%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
130 fps 215 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+65%

The high performance ray-tracing RTX 2080 Super follows the recent release of the 2060 Super and 2070 Super, from NVIDIA’s latest range of refreshed Turing RTX GPUs. The 2080 Super is a higher binned version of the original RTX 2080 which it replaces at the same price of $700 USD. In terms of specification changes between the two, the 2080 has 2944 CUDA cores, compared to 3072 in the 2080 Super, core and boost clocks have increased from 1515 MHz and 1710 MHz to 1650 MHz and 1815 MHz, respectively, memory bandwidth has increased from 14 Gbps to 15.5 Gbps and the TDP has increased from 215 W to 250 W. This translates to a roughly 10% effective speed advantage over the original 2080. The RTX 2080S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Competition in this price bracket is in the form of the AMD’s Radeon VII, over which, early benchmarks suggest, the 2080 Super commands a 15% effective speed advantage. The RTX 2080 Super however, is not a value champion and those seeking more bang for their buck may do well to consider Nvidia’s own $500 USD RTX 2070 Super (which has 17% lower effective speed). [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Whilst the drought in the GPU market continues, street prices for AMD cards are around 50% lower than comparable (based on headline average fps figures) Nvidia cards. Many experienced users simply have no interest in buying AMD cards, regardless of price. The combined market share for all of AMD’s RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers (Steam stats) is just 2.12% whilst Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5.03%. AMD’s Neanderthal marketing tactics seem to have come back to haunt them. Their brazen domination of social media platforms including youtube and reddit resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins and ignore the losses. Experienced gamers know all too well that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. [May '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback