COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
AMD
VS
▲ 53308 ▼
  

Release date ≈ Q3 2023.

Effective Speed 
+50%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 261,946 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
261,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 139% EVGA(3842 3183)
Worst Bench: 116% Asus(1043 8736) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 116% Great: 139%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 713
438 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 227% PowerColor(148C 2425) ≥ 4GB
Poor bench: 111% Sapphire(1DA2 475B) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 111% Great: 227%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		131 % 195 % Much faster effective speed.
+50%
Average Score 
+60%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		176 fps 248 fps Much better lighting effects.
+41%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		181 fps 320 fps Much better reflection handling.
+77%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		197 fps 308 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+56%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		156 fps 256 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+64%
Overclocked Score 
+64%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		192 fps 309 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+61%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		242 fps 375 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+55%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		210 fps 349 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+66%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		166 fps 288 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+73%
Value & Sentiment 
+484%
Market Share
Based on 68,657,996 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.72 % Hugely higher market share.
+929% 		0.07 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		74 % Much more popular.
+40% 		53 %
Nice To Haves 
+171%
Age
Newest 		63 Months 14+ Months Much more recent.
+78%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		202 fps 640 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+217%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		137 fps 387 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+182%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		180 fps 564 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+213%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		130 fps 345 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+165%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 131%
Average Bench 195%

The high performance ray-tracing RTX 2080 Super follows the recent release of the 2060 Super and 2070 Super, from NVIDIA’s latest range of refreshed Turing RTX GPUs. The 2080 Super is a higher binned version of the original RTX 2080 which it replaces at the same price of $700 USD. In terms of specification changes between the two, the 2080 has 2944 CUDA cores, compared to 3072 in the 2080 Super, core and boost clocks have increased from 1515 MHz and 1710 MHz to 1650 MHz and 1815 MHz, respectively, memory bandwidth has increased from 14 Gbps to 15.5 Gbps and the TDP has increased from 215 W to 250 W. This translates to a roughly 10% effective speed advantage over the original 2080. The RTX 2080S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Competition in this price bracket is in the form of the AMD’s Radeon VII, over which, early benchmarks suggest, the 2080 Super commands a 15% effective speed advantage. The RTX 2080 Super however, is not a value champion and those seeking more bang for their buck may do well to consider Nvidia’s own $500 USD RTX 2070 Super (which has 17% lower effective speed). [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. [Sep '24 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
261,508
438
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback