Today's hottest deals
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 16,954 user samples
10,225 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 314% Asus(1043 8963) ≥ 4GB
Poor bench: 283% Nvidia(10DE 18CB) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 283% Great: 314%
SPEED RANK: 2nd / 713
6,729 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 249% Asus(1043 05ED) ≥ 4GB
Poor bench: 176% XFX(1EAE 7905) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 176% Great: 249%
SPEED RANK: 8th / 713
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
300 % Much faster effective speed.
+36%
220 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
457 fps Much better lighting effects.
+66%
276 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
452 fps Better reflection handling.
+16%
389 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
520 fps Faster multi rendering.
+20%
435 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
392 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+72%
228 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
483 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+48%
326 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
482 fps +3% 470 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
541 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+12%
484 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
410 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+61%
254 fps
Market Share
Based on 68,681,914 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.38 % Hugely higher market share.
+667%
0.18 %
Value
Value For Money
71.8 % Better value.
+24%
58 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
52 %
Price
Price (score)
$990 $900 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
Age
Newest
9 Months Much more recent.
+59%
22 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
535 fps 661 fps Better peak texture detail.
+24%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
268 fps 462 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+72%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
489 fps 592 fps Better texture detail.
+21%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
258 fps 416 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+61%

20% Faster than the 4080. My avg GPU bench is 310%. [Oct '24 Pruden]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. [Dec '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback