Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 17:50
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 72
2-Core 138
61% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 364
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Gigabyte(1458 2270) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 14
8% 11.9 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 9.87
8% 9.26 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 703 746 742 740 647 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 770
Mixed 472
SusWrite 701
171% 766 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60
196% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 469
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 404
302% 404 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 167%
Great: 302%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
7GB free, PID 00d4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 45.1
Write 14.5
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 13.8
27% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 10%
8GB free, PID fafa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 6.9 6.8 9.7 6.1 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Read 17
Write 3.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.8
11% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
39GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8.6 8.4 8.5 8.1 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 10.8
Mixed 10
SusWrite 8.2
16% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.4
96% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback