HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1985
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 10 '16 at 09:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4600M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 55.8
2-Core 92.7
47% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 144
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8600M Dual Graphics
HP(103C 1985) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 6.06
5% 6.58 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 7.57
5% 5.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.W Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 260
Write 205
Mixed 214
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 7.04
50% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 6.95
10% 19 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
667GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 90.3
Mixed 85.8
66% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.22
78% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback