bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory225GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 225GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory25.5 GB free of 225 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 885 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime86 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 20:19
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU #000, 12 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 163
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 652
58% 489 Pts
64-Core 1,590
98% 1,590 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 68 83 126 71 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 238
Write 46.1
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 91.4
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 17.3
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 79.5
DQ Mixed 113
100% 157 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 52GB
23GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 117 82 45 47 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 175
Write 329
Mixed 155
SusWrite 72.1
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 18.2
46% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 118
106% 168 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 80%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
678GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 52 45 56 27 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
Read 66.4
Write 297
Mixed 146
SusWrite 51.1
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 11
29% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 116
100% 152 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 28%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 268GB
219GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 64 59 48 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.5% Below average
Read 345
Write 316
Mixed 399
SusWrite 61.2
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 12.9
32% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 114
100% 153 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 36%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 5.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 51 50 58 38 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.4% Poor
Read 43.6
Write 164
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 47.5
19% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 9.2
29% 8.7 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 115
100% 152 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 21%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
995GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 47 54 42 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.6% Very poor
Read 75.9
Write 206
Mixed 133
SusWrite 53
27% 117 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 16.8
36% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 28%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 9.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 407
Write 268
Mixed 305
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 15.7
36% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 115
93% 136 MB/s
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 107GB
78GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 60 70 60 40 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 187
Write 293
Mixed 235
SusWrite 59.9
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 10.5
29% 9.4 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 114
97% 148 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 225GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
161% Outstanding
MC Read 85.1
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 65.7
194% 67.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 161%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback