bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory225GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 225GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory63.4 GB free of 225 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1536 x 646 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime9.7 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU #000, 12 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 174
57% 105 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 655
58% 491 Pts
64-Core 1,947
120% 1,947 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 66 73 81 101 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 532
Write 332
Mixed 261
SusWrite 72.9
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 10.6
37% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 112
99% 153 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 52GB
24GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 81 72 50 36 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 373
Write 319
Mixed 225
SusWrite 64.6
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 19.3
46% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 82.7
DQ Mixed 120
108% 172 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 80%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
682GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 61 77 55 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
Read 182
Write 361
Mixed 235
SusWrite 53.9
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 9.1
33% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 115
99% 150 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 268GB
219GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 58 73 88 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22% Poor
Read 372
Write 347
Mixed 260
SusWrite 56
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 5.9
11% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 36%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 5.5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 73 72 69 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.32% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 108
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 55.5
11% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
2% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 21%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 1TB
976GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 63 76 96 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 132
Write 53.2
Mixed 272
SusWrite 60.4
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 9.5
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 117
100% 152 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Eqlogic 100E-00 Multi-Path Disk Device 107GB
78GB free
Firmware: 9.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 22 64 63 76 58 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.8% Very poor
Read 67.7
Write 52.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 52
12% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 17.4
27% 7.23 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 225GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
169% Outstanding
MC Read 89.2
MC Write 55.6
MC Mixed 70.6
205% 71.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 169%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback