Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '19 at 08:25
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 189 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 666 61% 511 Pts	64-Core 875 54% 875 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Nano-$450 504 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Gigabyte(1458 22C6) CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Lighting 69.2 Reflection 55.3 Parallax 99.4 56% 74.6 fps	MRender 56.2 Gravity 76.7 Splatting 71.9 56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Scorch M2 256GB 3,923 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FM12.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 891 636 264 264 265 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 804 Write 880 Mixed 790 SusWrite 536 170% 752 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 34.2 116% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 494 DQ Mixed 555 416% 558 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 151%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3TB free Firmware: G009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 152 152 152 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 145 Write 145 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 151 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273CH0- M393B5273CH0- M393B5173QH0- M393B5273CH0- 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 35.5 MC Mixed 32.8 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12.4 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	109x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	49x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	44x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	36x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	27x

SSD
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	22x
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	18x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	34x
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	31x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16