Average Bench: 71.5% (43rd of 611)

Based on 345 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Nano Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury, ASUS R9 NANO

Good average bench

The AMD R9 Nano averaged 28.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 202fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 207fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Nano is just 15.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Nano performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 143fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 116fps

Average Bench

(Based on 345 samples)
Min Avg Max
160 Lighting 202 238
127 Reflection 143 155
242 Parallax 305 346
73.9% 217 fps
Min Avg Max
108 MRender 116 125
187 Gravity 207 242
152 Splatting 164 176
69.8% 162 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Lighting 244
Reflection 144
Parallax 356
88% 248 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 265
Splatting 164
80% 182 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Lighting 212
Reflection 145
Parallax 304
76% 221 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 226
Splatting 164
73% 170 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Lighting 195
Reflection 145
Parallax 327
75% 222 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 224
Splatting 166
73% 170 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.3
Lighting 206
Reflection 146
Parallax 314
76% 222 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 210
Splatting 166
71% 165 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 211
Reflection 146
Parallax 303
76% 220 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 212
Splatting 166
71% 165 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Lighting 204
Reflection 146
Parallax 312
75% 221 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 210
Splatting 167
71% 165 fps
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 207
Reflection 147
Parallax 301
75% 218 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 208
Splatting 166
70% 164 fps
345 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 15,541,099 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 345 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 04A4) 54% 73% ± 6%
Asus R9 Nano 4GB
AmazonUS $6502 years
Asus R9 Nano 4GB White
AmazonUS $6602 years
Gigabyte(1458 22C6) 46% 70% ± 8%
Gigabyte R9 Nano 4GB
AmazonUS $4502 years
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Nano Builds (Compare 3,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 59%
Desktop 54%
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $840

Popular R9 Nano compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

Very High 1080p performance, ultra 60fps or medium 144hz with ease.


21 days ago.

best amd card in my opinion


1 month ago.

Got it at 250€ in 2018, a beast!


9 months ago.

Notice the performance drop with the newest drivers. First they gimp fury on API level and block HBM overclocking. On last 2017 drivers I could oc core to 1120Mhz, and memory to 560Mhz on stock voltage stable. Now I can do 1080Mhz core which is 40mhz less, and the memory ( that you can only change by modifying bios, and even then some people say it's forcefully locked to 500Mhz anyway ) I haven't even checked HBM oc yet. Will do, probably will be stable on 545Mhz if I had to guess. If AMD is gimping older generation gpu on purpose and the performance will continue to drop without giving any official and logical explanation I will say goodbye to their gpu's. Not nice AMD, not nice at all.


21 days ago.

so good for 3d animation


9 months ago.

not Titan Killer,280X and 290X is Titan Killers. R9 Fury X ,or new Fury X2,that is NVIDIA KILLER. LIKE RYZEN,BRUTAL INTEL KILLER


2 months ago.

In 2017 I have seen this GPU much cheaper and how it works is simply awesome, better than gtx 1060 6gb in my opinion Works really well for almost every game!


6 months ago.

Got it for 200€. Great card, tiny and powerful. Bought this instead of nVidia due to freesync and I regret nothing.

611 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $364Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $49
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $122Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $761SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $110SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback