Average Bench: 55.1% (63rd of 639)

Based on 427 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Nano Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury, ASUS R9 NANO

Average average bench

The AMD R9 Nano averaged 44.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 200fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 211fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Nano is just 9.16%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Nano performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 143fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 308fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 427 samples)
Min Avg Max
179 Lighting 200 227
134 Reflection 143 154
277 Parallax 308 338
52.5% 217 fps
Min Avg Max
110 MRender 117 123
189 Gravity 211 230
156 Splatting 164 175
55.5% 164 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Lighting 245
Reflection 146
Parallax 355
64% 249 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 264
Splatting 166
68% 183 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 206
Reflection 145
Parallax 312
54% 221 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 211
Splatting 166
56% 165 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Lighting 204
Reflection 146
Parallax 322
54% 224 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 210
Splatting 167
56% 165 fps
427 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 31,327,015 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 427 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Gigabyte(1458 22C6) 54% 54% ± 3%
Gigabyte R9 Nano 4GB
GV-R9NANO-4GD-B
AmazonUS $4503 years
Asus(1043 04A4) 46% 57% ± 3%
Asus R9 Nano 4GB
R9NANO-4GB
AmazonUS $6503 years
Asus R9 Nano 4GB White
R9NANO-4G-WHITE
AmazonUS $6603 years
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Nano Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $450

Popular R9 Nano compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

6 months ago.

Better than any Nvidia I ran across.


Excellent

2 months ago.

still useing one in 2020 and it still dose great


Excellent

7 days ago.

cuz good


Good

18 months ago.

Got it at 250€ in 2018, a beast!


Average

2 years ago.

Notice the performance drop with the newest drivers. First they gimp fury on API level and block HBM overclocking. On last 2017 drivers I could oc core to 1120Mhz, and memory to 560Mhz on stock voltage stable. Now I can do 1080Mhz core which is 40mhz less, and the memory ( that you can only change by modifying bios, and even then some people say it's forcefully locked to 500Mhz anyway ) I haven't even checked HBM oc yet. Will do, probably will be stable on 545Mhz if I had to guess. If AMD is gimping older generation gpu on purpose and the performance will continue to drop without giving any official and logical explanation I will say goodbye to their gpu's. Not nice AMD, not nice at all.


Excellent

2 years ago.

not Titan Killer,280X and 290X is Titan Killers. R9 Fury X ,or new Fury X2,that is NVIDIA KILLER. LIKE RYZEN,BRUTAL INTEL KILLER


Excellent

20 days ago.

mini version of fury x . looks beatiful. runs normally some games at 2020 but 4gb vram size is poor


Average

9 months ago.

A tiny beast for a little fire ants. Still sold at exorbitantly high prices for RX 580-like performance which makes this not worth buying.


Average

14 months ago.

Great size and performance. Bad value today.


Good

27 days ago.

Small and reasonably powerful even in 2020. If power consumption isn't an issue and you need a small card, picking it up for cheap on the used market is the way to go.


Excellent

19 months ago.

In 2017 I have seen this GPU much cheaper and how it works is simply awesome, better than gtx 1060 6gb in my opinion Works really well for almost every game!


Excellent

22 months ago.

Got it for 200€. Great card, tiny and powerful. Bought this instead of nVidia due to freesync and I regret nothing.


Your
opinion?
639 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $330Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback