Average Bench: 53.1% (77th of 651)

Based on 431 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 7300 Nano Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 Fury, ASUS R9 NANO

Average average bench

The AMD R9 Nano averaged 46.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 67.9fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 56.1fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R9 Nano is just 9.15%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R9 Nano performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 96.8fps
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 55.4fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 431 samples)
Min Avg Max
62.1 Lighting 67.9 75.4
52.5 Reflection 55.4 59.4
88.3 Parallax 96.8 106
55.4% 73.4 fps
Min Avg Max
52.8 MRender 56.1 59.7
63.8 Gravity 70.9 77.1
68.2 Splatting 71.6 76.3
35.2% 66.2 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 99.4
56% 74.5 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 71.2
35% 66.7 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 96.5
56% 73.9 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 70.5
35% 66.1 fps
CLim: 1039 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 108
55% 81.1 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 41.9
36% 58.1 fps
CLim: 1015 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 97.8
54% 73.7 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 73.2
36% 66.9 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 100
54% 77.7 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 41.1
36% 56.9 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 55.5
Parallax 101
53% 73.8 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 70
Splatting 72.2
35% 66.2 fps
CLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Lighting 64
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 93.2
52% 71 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 71.7
35% 65.2 fps
431 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 35,842,246 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 431 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Gigabyte(1458 22C6) 54% 52% ± 3%
Gigabyte R9 Nano 4GB
GV-R9NANO-4GD-B
AmazonUS $4503 years
Asus(1043 04A4) 46% 54% ± 3%
Asus R9 Nano 4GB
R9NANO-4GB
AmazonUS $6503 years
Asus R9 Nano 4GB White
R9NANO-4G-WHITE
AmazonUS $6604 years
Send price feedback
Typical R9 Nano Builds (Compare 2,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B85-G43 GAMING (MS-7816) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $740

Popular R9 Nano compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

10 months ago.

Better than any Nvidia I ran across.


Excellent

6 months ago.

still useing one in 2020 and it still dose great


Good

22 months ago.

Got it at 250€ in 2018, a beast!


Average

2 years ago.

Notice the performance drop with the newest drivers. First they gimp fury on API level and block HBM overclocking. On last 2017 drivers I could oc core to 1120Mhz, and memory to 560Mhz on stock voltage stable. Now I can do 1080Mhz core which is 40mhz less, and the memory ( that you can only change by modifying bios, and even then some people say it's forcefully locked to 500Mhz anyway ) I haven't even checked HBM oc yet. Will do, probably will be stable on 545Mhz if I had to guess. If AMD is gimping older generation gpu on purpose and the performance will continue to drop without giving any official and logical explanation I will say goodbye to their gpu's. Not nice AMD, not nice at all.


Excellent

2 years ago.

not Titan Killer,280X and 290X is Titan Killers. R9 Fury X ,or new Fury X2,that is NVIDIA KILLER. LIKE RYZEN,BRUTAL INTEL KILLER


Excellent

4 months ago.

mini version of fury x . looks beatiful. runs normally some games at 2020 but 4gb vram size is poor


Average

13 months ago.

A tiny beast for a little fire ants. Still sold at exorbitantly high prices for RX 580-like performance which makes this not worth buying.


Average

18 months ago.

Great size and performance. Bad value today.


Good

4 months ago.

Small and reasonably powerful even in 2020. If power consumption isn't an issue and you need a small card, picking it up for cheap on the used market is the way to go.


Excellent

22 months ago.

In 2017 I have seen this GPU much cheaper and how it works is simply awesome, better than gtx 1060 6gb in my opinion Works really well for almost every game!


Excellent

2 years ago.

Got it for 200€. Great card, tiny and powerful. Bought this instead of nVidia due to freesync and I regret nothing.


Your
opinion?
651 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback