Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3099-A1
Memory	43.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180615
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '19 at 06:17
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 0 77 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 159 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 561 50% 420 Pts	64-Core 1,512 94% 1,512 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8586) 2GB CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24% Poor	Lighting 28.8 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 27.2 24% 28.8 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 27.2 Splatting 28.9 25% 31 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 480GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 62 6.9 6.3 7 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 1,052 Write 1,050 Mixed 1,062 SusWrite 91.8 182% 814 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 30.5 4K Mixed 30.5 115% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 209 157% 210 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 139%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 599GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 126% 231GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 55 14 13 14 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 1,063 Write 1,016 Mixed 1,042 SusWrite 65 178% 797 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 35 121% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 194 149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 176%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70QB0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70DH0- Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 48GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 28.4 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.5 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2407 01stBench 49%, 63 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 01stBench 58%, 75 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1x

SSD
PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 41%, 2,811 samples	1x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B5270DH0- M393B5170EH1- M393B1K70DH0- M393B5270DH0- M393B5170EH1- 32GBSamsungBench 30%, 1 sample	1x
M393B1K70QB0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 415 samples	1x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59