Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 21:32
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 324
105% 194 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,218
111% 930 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 65.7
62% 72.4 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 69.5
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 285 290 294 299 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 178
Mixed 302
SusWrite 293
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 38.8
151% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 236
184% 251 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
316GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 121 121 120 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 145
Write 129
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 121
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
57GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 61 26 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 162
Write 57.5
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 35.7
92% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.8
164% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 32.6
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 30.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $552
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback