PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191011 |
Uptime | 3.7 Days |
Run Date | Jan 13 '20 at 20:55 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
|
32%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 151 152 152 152 152 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
169GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 402 411 413 413 422 MB/s
|
95.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FE CT4G4DFS8266.C8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
80.5%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,871x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 866x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 188x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 460x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 396x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 356x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $279 |