Asrock Z87M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131225
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateDec 25 '16 at 20:19
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 199
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 347
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 35.8
36% 36.5 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ VT180 240GB-$160
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 362
Write 399
Mixed 207
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 16.9
97% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 18.2
30% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 111%
Toshiba MD03ACA400V 4TB
373GB free
Firmware: FL1V Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 126
Mixed 83.3
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.38
77% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$190
685GB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 148
Mixed 31.8
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.46
135% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8C-PB 99U5471-012.A00LF Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8C-PB 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Extreme4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback