Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '20 at 09:14
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 75.1 1-Core 142 2-Core 285 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 555 8-Core 898 89% 726 Pts	64-Core 1438 89% 1438 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.2% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 142 Parallax 120 99% 128 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 128 Splatting 105 94% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 110%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% PNY(196E 118B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 4.23 Parallax 4.12 4% 4.23 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 6 4% 4.56 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 1334 816 814 800 816 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2,450 Write 1,752 Mixed 1,617 SusWrite 919 376% 1,684 MB/s	4K Read 62 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 86.5 278% 95.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,215 DQ Write 1,080 DQ Mixed 1,142 858% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 355%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 22GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 465 Write 440 Mixed 337 92% 414 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 80 4K Mixed 47.8 163% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 149% 197 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 123%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 185GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 235 106 105 99 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 440 Mixed 345 SusWrite 180 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 52 174% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 201 149% 197 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 123%
Sandisk Z400s M.2 2280 256GB 2,644 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 68GB free Firmware: Z2329012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 279 302 295 295 305 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 442 Write 296 Mixed 214 SusWrite 287 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 13.7 72% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 83.6 101% 173 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 545GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 139 138 137 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 129 Write 120 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 136 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 125 115 121 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 150 Write 159 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 121 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL32G32C16U4RL.M16FB 2x31.5GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.5% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 16.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.4 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	516x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	405x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,033

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16