Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 15:46
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 209
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 772
70% 589 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 1995 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 36
41% 44.3 fps
MRender 43.6
Gravity 50
Splatting 50.4
40% 48 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 317 135 400 473 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,615
Write 1,556
Mixed 168
SusWrite 327
203% 917 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 65.4
190% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 307
318% 526 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 173%
Great: 277%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
9GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 117 135 135 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 124
Write 84.3
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 130
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73%
Great: 96%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$220
26GB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 213 179 175 193 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 160
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 183
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.3
292% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
145GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 117 115 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61% Good
Read 97.7
Write 97
Mixed 68
SusWrite 115
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61%
Great: 87%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$209
7GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 162
Mixed 88
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.8
376% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate ST16000NE000-2RW103 16TB
14GB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 233 226 196 201 213 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 86%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
13GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 28 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 33.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 25.6
40% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 61%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
150GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.5 10 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 13
38% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 31.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 27.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback