Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '17 at 07:13
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$194
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 163
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 524
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (40 fps cap detected)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 35.3
33% 36.4 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 39.2
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 128GB-$93
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 700
Write 324
Mixed 434
107% 486 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 20
107% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 68.9
DQ Mixed 44.9
36% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
89GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 97.1
Mixed 96.8
74% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.23
101% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$56
58GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 62
Mixed 65.5
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.34
110% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
57GB free
Firmware: CC3E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 64.3
Mixed 57.7
47% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.36
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
24GB free
Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 87.8
Mixed 82.6
67% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 103%
WD My Passport 0830 500GB
384GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 35.2
Mixed 35
46% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.25
79% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 45%
HGST TOURO S 1TB
72GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 75
Write 77.7
Mixed 72.9
97% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1866C9-8GSR F3-1600C9-8GSR F3-1866C9-8GSR 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback