PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190524 |
Uptime | 11.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '20 at 03:41 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD240GM7B 240GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 63 14 2.2 39 31 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
64.4%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,879x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 869x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 193x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 464x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 399x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 359x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $279 |