Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Huananzhi X99-F8 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory	22.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	15.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '20 at 19:41
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 181 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 605 56% 465 Pts	64-Core 874 54% 874 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 13.9 Parallax 0.3 29% 16.6 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 27 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 3.9 129 38 82 154 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.6% Very poor	Read 170 Write 52.6 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 96.8 18% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.1 22% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 54%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 143 147 149 138 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 150 Write 152 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 142 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 164GB free Firmware: 0117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 69 69 69 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 107 Write 98.9 Mixed 37 SusWrite 68 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 62%
Samsung M2 Portable 3 640GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 355GB free, PID 60c4 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 81.4 Write 18.2 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 73.1 62% 50.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 38%
WDC WD12 0EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 1.2 0.6 1.3 0.1 0.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 203 Write 210 Mixed 205 SusWrite 0.7 201% 155 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 2.9 286% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 84%
ST2000VM 003-1ET164 2TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 9GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 111 124 127 120 142 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 117 Write 152 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 125 160% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 55%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 148GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 112 121 129 119 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 130 Write 134 Mixed 114 SusWrite 124 171% 125 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.7 194% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 13.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 80%

Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	137x
Xeon E5-2680 v4IntelBench 72%, 1,639 samples	59x
Xeon E5-2680 v3IntelBench 71%, 1,417 samples	32x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	41x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	29x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	23x

SSD
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	26x
512GB 512GBNvmeBench 181%, 2,208 samples	11x
GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GBXPGBench 246%, 21,659 samples	10x

RAM
HNMI8GD4240D0 4x8GBUnknownBench 91%, 126 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)