Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Huananzhi X99-F8 (all builds)
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200826
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 188 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 626 60% 494 Pts	64-Core 880 54% 880 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 42 29% 39 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 27.2 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45 55,360 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 535 534 742 312 72 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 942 Write 535 Mixed 638 SusWrite 386 139% 625 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 56.4 206% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 543 DQ Mixed 414 327% 448 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 253%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 985GB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 134 137 136 134 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 162 Write 158 Mixed 62 SusWrite 136 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 124GB free Firmware: 0117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 64 66 66 66 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 99.9 Write 100 Mixed 37 SusWrite 65.1 55% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 62%
Samsung M2 Portable 3 640GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 232GB free, PID 60c4 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 76 77 76 77 77 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 78.4 Write 17.9 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 73.1 63% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 38%
WDC WD12 0EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 81 71 61 68 80 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 200 Write 205 Mixed 198 SusWrite 70.2 223% 168 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 3.3 284% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 84%
ST2000VM 003-1ET164 2TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 13GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 163 137 122 142 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 128 Write 108 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 144 151% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 55%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 36GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 65 59 74 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 31.8 Write 129 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 74.7 120% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 182% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.5% Very good	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 24.2 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 19 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	21.5"	1280 720	ACI22CA ASUS VP229

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 80%

Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

CPU
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	137x
Xeon E5-2680 v4IntelBench 72%, 1,639 samples	59x
Xeon E5-2680 v3IntelBench 71%, 1,417 samples	32x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	41x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	29x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	23x

SSD
NE-512 512GBBench 177%, 5,933 samples	26x
512GB 512GBNvmeBench 181%, 2,208 samples	11x
GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GBXPGBench 246%, 21,659 samples	10x

RAM
HNMI8GD4240D0 4x8GBUnknownBench 91%, 126 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	23x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)