Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation 690 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0MY171
Memory	3.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071213
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '21 at 02:24
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345 462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Microprocessor, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 59.4 1-Core 26.8 2-Core 53.5 32% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 184 17% 144 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 042F) 2GB CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1210 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 36.4 Parallax 43.6 27% 37.8 fps	MRender 30.2 Gravity 31.3 Splatting 24.8 23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 35 33 21 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.3% Poor	Read 103 Write 83.2 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 32 17% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 14.1 46% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 18.3 DQ Write 13.4 DQ Mixed 19.1 13% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 51%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 105GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 38 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 83.3 Write 81.7 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 37.7 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 128GB free Firmware: K SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 36 36 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 64.8 Write 73.6 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 36.8 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x1GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12 of 16 slots used 12GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16