Asrock X570 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210126
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '21 at 11:54
Run Duration	484 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 87.7 1-Core 163 2-Core 325 103% 192 Pts	4-Core 633 8-Core 1,228 110% 931 Pts	64-Core 2,789 173% 2,789 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AE) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.5% Above average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 71.3 Parallax 63.6 54% 66.8 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 66.2 54% 65.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 334GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1068 803 771 746 828 853 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 2,150 Write 2,242 Mixed 1,661 SusWrite 845 387% 1,724 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 67.9 235% 81.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,287 DQ Write 1,152 DQ Mixed 1,236 922% 1,225 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 306GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 296 281 260 264 259 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 333 Write 296 Mixed 273 SusWrite 275 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 27 105% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 159 128% 180 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 129%
Asmt 2115 14TB 849GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 177 179 179 174 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75% Very good	Read 350 Write 366 Mixed 346 SusWrite 176 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 40.8 130% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 190 147% 202 MB/s

Asmt 2115 12TB 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 177 179 179 174 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.3% Very good	Read 402 Write 352 Mixed 349 SusWrite 176 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 39.8 128% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 189 147% 202 MB/s

Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 222GB free Firmware: LHGNT384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 177 177 184 178 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 225 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 175 128% 175 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.3 282% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 135%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 273GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 94 95 94 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 546GB free Firmware: LHGNT384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 102 100 100 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 160 Write 154 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 100 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.5 303% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 135%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 128GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 98 106 115 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 135 Write 134 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 105 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 164% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 87GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 94 97 95 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 143 Write 136 Mixed 77.6 SusWrite 95 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 122GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 103 106 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 101 Write 96.5 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 102 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 107GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 85 85 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 119 Write 129 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 84.3 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 185GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 159 144 123 122 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 263GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 209 211 211 207 205 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 307GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 95 95 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 151 Write 153 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 94.8 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 113%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$240 1,221 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 117GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 164 172 167 170 166 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 146 Write 148 Mixed 90.8 SusWrite 168 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.4 302% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 138%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 319GB free Firmware: LHGNT384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 173 194 197 191 183 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 120 Write 124 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 188 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.6 289% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 135%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE600 10TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 86GB free Firmware: LHGNT384 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 178 177 172 175 176 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 193 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 177 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.5 296% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 135%
Asmt 2115 10TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 796GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 148 148 146 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 124 Write 127 Mixed 111 SusWrite 147 94% 127 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.4 394% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 132%
Asmt 2115 10TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 207GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 157 156 156 158 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 174 Mixed 118 SusWrite 157 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 1.1 347% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 45.6 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 32.3 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 27.2 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 33.7 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Pro4 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	141x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	121x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	97x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	61x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	59x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	53x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	33x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	31x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	19x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $561

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16