PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Vostro 260 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0GDG8Y |
Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130222 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '21 at 00:20 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 101 98 109 103 109 MB/s
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
442GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 121 123 121 123 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Jmicron Tech 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 0407
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 12 14 14 MB/s
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
465GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 99 108 108 102 107 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
516GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 12 12 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G6M1 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 151x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 141x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 50x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 187x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |