Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	NM70-M
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1037U 2,458 User benchmarks, average bench 43% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 48.4 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 94.4 38% 64.2 Pts	4-Core 95.9 8-Core 94.4 13% 95.2 Pts	64-Core 94.8 6% 94.8 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 3650 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 2% PwrHis(1787 2003) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.4 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 4.3 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingFast 60GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.094.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 26 40 43 43 41 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19% Very poor	Read 256 Write 2 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 34.3 19% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 6.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 27 DQ Mixed 9.3 12% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 59%
Fc-1307 SD to CF Adapter V1.1 67GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 62GB free Firmware: Rev 1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.04% Terrible	Read 1.5 Write 0.2 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 1.2 1% 0.78 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 3%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$99 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 74GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 55 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 54.8 Write 54.4 Mixed 36.9 SusWrite 55.7 37% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%
Generic Flash Disk0912 124GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 76GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 7 8.8 8.6 9.4 9.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7.7 Write 1.7 SusWrite 7.8 7% 5.73 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 7.8 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,102x
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,630x
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	966x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,160x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,096x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	851x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	460x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	442x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	526x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	384x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	308x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406