Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
Motherboard NM70-M
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 85.6
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 93.3
50% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 95.1
8-Core 98.1
13% 96.6 Pts
64-Core 95.3
6% 95.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.28% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.28%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 60GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.094.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 6.4 8.9 10 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 380
Write 49
Mixed 65
SusWrite 12.7
27% 127 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 39.5
DQ Write 51.7
DQ Mixed 0.7
13% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 59%
Fc-1307 SD to CF Adapter V1.1 67GB
62GB free
Firmware: Rev 1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1 1 0.9 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3
Write 0.2
SusWrite 1.2
1% 1.47 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 3%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$99
74GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 52 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 53.7
Write 53.1
Mixed 37
SusWrite 52.9
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Generic Flash Disk0912 124GB
76GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 18 19 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6.7
Write 0.2
SusWrite 15.3
10% 7.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BA160B.C8FE 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback