PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK TUF B450-PLUS GAMING |
Memory | 27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210112 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 13 '21 at 17:28 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8641) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
|
57.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 436 448 450 237 214 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
134GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 471 401 287 287 287 MB/s
|
119%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
414GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 107 106 106 108 MB/s
|
63%
Good
|
|||
WD Elements 2621 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s
|
51%
Above average
|
|||
HitachiG ST 500GB
328GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
98.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 239x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $242Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 374x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 98x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $635 |