Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 21:35
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 267
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 786
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 38.9
32% 40.4 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 29
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 1TB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1006 1029 1048 1053 1052 1051 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,678
Write 1,007
Mixed 867
SusWrite 1,040
256% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 49.2
187% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 456
377% 533 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 213%
Great: 268%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
101GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 96 89 76 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 142
Write 114
Mixed 114
SusWrite 89
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 26.5
123% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 87.5
74% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$32
173GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 65 65 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 65.2
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 61.8
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 41%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Read 10
Write 10.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 12
8% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 66%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
18GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 21.5
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 12.1
11% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
186% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 63%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB
108GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.4 9.6 9.5 9.4 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.47% Terrible
Read 16
Write 19.3
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 9.7
21% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.47%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MK3259GSX 320GB
210GB free, PID 70f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11
Mixed 4.2
7% 7.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
8% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 19%
Samsung G2 Portable 500GB
34GB free, PID 6033
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 16.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 9.3
19% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $936
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback