Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '21 at 02:49
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 81.6 1-Core 150 2-Core 294 95% 175 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,079 99% 829 Pts	64-Core 1,402 87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 138 Parallax 128 106% 132 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 136 Splatting 119 101% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2631 Write 2,054 Mixed 1,900 487% 2,195 MB/s	4K Read 67.7 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 96.3 323% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,132 DQ Write 997 DQ Mixed 999 767% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 80GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,231 Write 6,828 Mixed 6,962 1,566% 7,007 MB/s	4K Read 491 4K Write 233 4K Mixed 281 1,227% 335 MB/s	DQ Read 1,388 DQ Write 1,043 DQ Mixed 1,089 849% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1741 1759 1760 1758 1633 1450 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	354% Outstanding	Read 2535 Write 1,722 Mixed 1,717 SusWrite 1,684 428% 1,914 MB/s	4K Read 66.5 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 94.3 313% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,211 DQ Write 1,149 DQ Mixed 1,163 878% 1,174 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 354% Great: 431%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 145 141 140 143 145 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 137 Write 115 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 140 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 597GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 154 154 154 154 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 145 Write 141 Mixed 90.4 SusWrite 153 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 109%
Synology iSCSI Storage 1TB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1TB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 14.1 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 5.4 7% 9.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 56%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 28GB free, PID 005b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9 8.2 9.2 8.5 8.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	7.5% Terrible	Read 27.4 Write 11.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 8.7 14% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.5% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB 13,134 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 33.4 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 27.2 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 36.3 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	144	27"	1280 720	AUS27B1 ROG PG278QR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,142x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,716x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	914x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	881x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	699x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	276x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,487

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16