Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 165% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 165% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	218% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	41.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '21 at 02:21
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 197 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 696 70% 566 Pts	64-Core 1,294 80% 1,294 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$785 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	218% Outstanding	Lighting 323 Reflection 296 Parallax 358 263% 326 fps	MRender 365 Gravity 266 Splatting 191 215% 274 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 511GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1010 1013 1036 1055 1052 1050 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,290 Write 1,089 Mixed 897 SusWrite 1,036 242% 1,078 MB/s	4K Read 51.9 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 65.8 220% 75.1 MB/s	DQ Read 686 DQ Write 700 DQ Mixed 272 320% 553 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 295%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 123 123 121 121 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 438 Mixed 348 SusWrite 160 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 46.7 164% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 361 274% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 124%
Corsair Force 3 90GB-$242 1,943 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 69GB free Firmware: 1.3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 85 86 85 85 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 185 Write 88.4 Mixed 117 SusWrite 82.4 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 27.2 111% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 110 84% 115 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 56%
Corsair Force GS 180GB-$134 623 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 48GB free Firmware: 5.20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 142 138 118 120 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 351 Write 185 Mixed 264 SusWrite 130 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 39.6 146% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 234 178% 240 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 5TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 146 150 148 152 151 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 162 Write 110 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 147 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 144 147 152 150 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 104 Write 140 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 147 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3600C19-8GVRB F4-3600C19-16GVRB F4-3600C19-8GVRB F4-3600C19-16GVRB 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.8% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 25 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 22.9 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 81: 8R 10G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
81%	32%	92	316	249	100	24.5"	1920 1080	AOC2590 2590G4

History: Score 43: 3R 8G 4B | Score 81: 8R 10G 11B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16