Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 03:38
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9900K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$295
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 239
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 865
78% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,535
95% 1,535 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 84%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 13A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.1% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 106
Parallax 121
96% 115 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 108
Splatting 101
102% 128 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 100 105 72 76 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 230
Write 88
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 85.8
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 22.1
82% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 109
84% 113 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
72GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 585 594 584 581 563 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 633
Write 576
Mixed 571
SusWrite 566
132% 586 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 62.4
198% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 1010
690% 847 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 156%
Great: 346%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
194GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 142 142 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 137
Write 140
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 140
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback