bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '17 at 17:45
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 169
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 341
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 38.1
32% 36.2 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 38
Splatting 36.7
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigastone SS6200-256GB 256GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0724B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 406
Write 327
Mixed 319
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 17.7
94% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 95.9
DQ Mixed 19.3
27% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
249GB free
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 82.8
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.31
84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
145GB free
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 75
Mixed 33.7
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.22
65% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 88%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
5GB free, PID a815
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 6.22
Mixed 6.76
12% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.61
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.008
25% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AY-1G1D1 Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB RMR1870ED48E8F1333 Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1066, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback