bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '18 at 22:47
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 165
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 271
38% 279 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 34.8
32% 35.4 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 37
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
832GB free
Firmware: AX101U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 101
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.21
73% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 82.9
Write 80.1
Mixed 66.1
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.38
92% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AY-1G1D1 Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB RMR1870ED48E8F1333 Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1066, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback