MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS (all builds)
Memory	16.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '22 at 10:38
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 233 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 680 65% 539 Pts	64-Core 898 56% 898 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% MSI(1462 2733) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 24.3 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 29.9 20% 29.2 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 21.7 19% 23.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,555 Write 2,138 Mixed 1,763 478% 2,152 MB/s	4K Read 65.3 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 81.9 267% 88.8 MB/s	DQ Read 891 DQ Write 654 DQ Mixed 751 567% 766 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 242GB free Firmware: 1AA01112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 9.8 11 16 17 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 36GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 37 30 32 30 32 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 143 Write 104 Mixed 110 SusWrite 42.9 127% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 3.7 250% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 29 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 34.3 SC Mixed 26.7 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,176x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	751x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	645x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	323x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	283x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	225x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	147x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	134x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	205x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	168x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $706

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16