HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive11.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE4h
Memory12.1 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3570-$49
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 413
46% 360 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 881A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 7.6
6% 8.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.2
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 13 12 24 13 2.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.9% Very poor
Read 161
Write 78.8
Mixed 5
SusWrite 11.5
14% 64 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0
18% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
75GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 128 127 129 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 122
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 128
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 84%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4TB free, PID 2647
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 110 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 104
Write 106
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 110
128% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.7
347% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 0.6
423% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 50GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback