Asrock B365M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 21:42
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,131
100% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.6% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 73
Parallax 67
57% 69.8 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 64.5
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 229 205 190 218 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 452
Write 190
Mixed 241
SusWrite 211
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 15.7
59% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 44.3
DQ Mixed 99.4
102% 176 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 133%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 238 226 222 256 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 436
Write 193
Mixed 37
SusWrite 221
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 6
44% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 11
33% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
670GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 162 149 147 166 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 166
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 152
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
831GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 67 66 66 73 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 73.9
Write 88.5
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 65.9
45% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
470GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 68 66 65 73 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 95.5
Mixed 81
SusWrite 65.8
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
184% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 67 62 63 74 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 90.5
Write 87
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 64.2
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.3
132% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 69 66 66 73 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 102%
SABRENT 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 281 278 271 316 274 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
198GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 69 66 65 73 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 91.6
Write 97.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 66.4
90% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 69 66 65 73 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 107
SusWrite 66.6
165% 127 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.5
192% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51%
Great: 95%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 3400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 11 10 10 12 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Read 21
Write 11.2
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 10.4
16% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 7%
Mobile Drive 500GB
0GB free, PID fc1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.2
Write 66.2
Mixed 23.1
63% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
4TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 177 161 160 177 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 173
Write 149
Mixed 112
SusWrite 165
200% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.M8FB 859B BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 859B CT16G4DFRA32A.M8FB 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 27
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 26
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $519
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback