Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration	336 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 68.3 1-Core 145 2-Core 284 88% 166 Pts	4-Core 567 8-Core 1,078 98% 823 Pts	64-Core 2,121 131% 2,121 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86BA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.9% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 49.6 45% 54.4 fps	MRender 42.6 Gravity 50.3 Splatting 46.5 38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,524 Write 2,420 Mixed 1,832 503% 2,259 MB/s	4K Read 69.3 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 90.9 309% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,275 DQ Write 917 DQ Mixed 1,090 816% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 2TB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 189GB free Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1528 210 309 221 160 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,380 Write 2,425 Mixed 1,482 SusWrite 432 323% 1,430 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 74.4 256% 95.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,246 DQ Write 1,176 DQ Mixed 1,245 925% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 379%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 87GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 81 79 75 80 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34% Below average	Read 41 Write 62.6 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 75.8 43% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.4 178% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 146GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 82 77 80 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 48.8 Write 73 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 78.6 48% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.4 176% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 90%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB 1,183 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 58GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 81 79 80 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 70.5 Write 75.9 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 79.8 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 92%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$175 125 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 159GB free Firmware: AV01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 107 109 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 106 Write 102 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 108 72% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 477% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 89%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 425GB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 124 121 120 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 116 Write 105 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 121 69% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 130%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 445GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 125 124 123 122 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 538 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.8% Very good	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 28.1 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 26.2 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,643x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,412x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,236x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,468x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16