Asus PRIME B360-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 20:35
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 719
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.5% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 47.5
Parallax 37.2
29% 40.1 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 26.6
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2058 754 616 615 630 628 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2030
Write 1,933
Mixed 1,242
SusWrite 884
340% 1,522 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 66
214% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,000
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 926
671% 876 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 240%
Great: 340%
WD WD80EDBZ-11B0ZA0 8TB
150GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 94 99 97 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.7
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 99
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.3
332% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58%
Great: 117%
Seagate Expansion HDD 4TB
14GB free
Firmware: 1901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 62 62 62 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 43.9
Write 59
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 65.5
44% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
139% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S949B2UUH-ITR 0B2C HKED4081CAA2F2HB2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 27" 1920 1017 AOC2778 2778G5
Typical PRIME B360-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360-PLUS - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback