Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 02 '24 at 01:27
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$269
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 969
91% 754 Pts
64-Core 994
62% 994 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSI(1462 5100) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 458
Parallax 362
230% 367 fps
MRender 504
Gravity 309
Splatting 242
275% 352 fps
Poor: 217%
This bench: 217%
Great: 267%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1492
Write 1,541
Mixed 1,191
314% 1408 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 59
200% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,237
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 997
782% 1,084 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
478GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 127 127 127 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 170
Write 167
Mixed 108
SusWrite 126
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
451GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 199 203 200 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 120
Write 98.7
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 200
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE1 029E CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 859B BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback