Real World Speed
Performance profile from 70,310 user samples
3,178 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 66% AMD(1002 0B36)
Poor: 66% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 566
67,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 62% EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 62% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 566
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
80.2 % 97.7 % Faster effective speed.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
346 fps Slightly better texture detail.
323 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
118 fps 192 fps Much faster multi rendering.
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
251 fps 285 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
166 fps 197 fps Faster complex splatting.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
390 fps 390 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
125 fps 215 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
274 fps 328 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
175 fps 227 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
Market Share
Based on 7,783,279 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.05 % 0.88 % Insanely higher market share.
Value For Money
70 % 74.6 % Slightly better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % 106 % More popular.
Price (score)
$450 Cheaper.
33 Months +3% 34 Months
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
253 fps 374 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
155 fps 323 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
226 fps 315 fps Much better lighting effects.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
145 fps 280 fps Hugely better reflection handling.

The AMD R9 Fury X sports a brand new Fiji GPU which succeeds Hawaii as AMD's new high end GPU (Hawaii powers the 290/X and 390/X series cards). The new GPU is coupled with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) which is a new memory architecture that allows for significantly higher bandwidth than previous generations. The Fury X is factory overclocked and has a TDP of just 275W, 4GB of VRAM and it comes fitted with a water cooling system which results in a relatively small form factor for a top end graphics card. Although the Fury X only has 4GB of VRAM, this is rarely a problem for gaming even at 4K resolutions. The key comparable for the Fury X is Nvidia's similarly priced 980 Ti. Comparing the 980 Ti and Fury X shows that at stock clocks there is very little between the two cards but 980 Ti has significantly better overclocking potential where it leads by up to 25%. Overall the Fury X trades blows with the best GPUs currently available. [Jun '15 GPUPro]


The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our calculated are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback