Real World Speed
Performance profile from 19,065 user samples
3,914 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Sapphire(174B E331)
Worst Bench: 40% Sapphire(174B E331)
Poor: 40% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 546
15,151 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 48% PowerColor(148C 2373)
Poor: 48% Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 546
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
76 % Much faster effective speed.
+34%
56.7 % -34%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
320 fps Much better texture detail.
+45%
221 fps -45%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
116 fps -11% 129 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+11%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
223 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+46%
153 fps -46%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+37%
119 fps -37%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
371 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+42%
262 fps -42%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps -7% 139 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
251 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+43%
175 fps -43%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+45%
126 fps -45%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
236 fps Much Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+69%
140 fps -69%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
117 fps Much Better Overwatch fps.
+38%
84.9 fps -38%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86.3 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+63%
52.8 fps -63%
Market Share
Based on 5,365,381 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.09 % -267% 0.33 % Hugely higher market share.
+267%
Value
Value For Money
54.8 % -51% 82.8 % Much better value.
+51%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % -25% 95 % More popular.
+25%
Price
Price (score)
$600 -65% $208 Much cheaper.
+65%
Age
Newest
27 Months -48% 14 Months Much more recent.
+48%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
258 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+34%
192 fps -34%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
161 fps -9% 175 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+9%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
229 fps Much better lighting effects.
+45%
158 fps -45%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
143 fps -13% 161 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+13%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $222Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $145
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback