Real World Speed
Performance profile from 62,406 user samples
48,373 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 51% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 544
14,033 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 47% MSI(1462 3411)
Poor: 47% Great: 63%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 544
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
55.7 % -15%
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
250 fps Better texture detail.
216 fps -16%
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
128 fps -8%
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
179 fps Faster NBody calculation.
150 fps -19%
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
118 fps -6%
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
296 fps Better peak texture detail.
256 fps -16%
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
149 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
139 fps -7%
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
204 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
174 fps -17%
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
134 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
126 fps -6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
140 fps -15%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.3 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
84.9 fps -9%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.9 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
47.6 fps -11%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
52.8 fps -45%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.1 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
53 fps -25%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.4 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
73.5 fps -26%
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
89.8 fps -31%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.8 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
48.6 fps -15%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
95.7 fps -5%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
202 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
192 fps -5%
Market Share
Based on 4,630,619 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.5 % Hugely higher market share.
0.48 % -212%
Value For Money
61.2 % -33% 81.3 % Much better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
139 % Much more popular.
91 % -53%
Price (score)
$390 -47% $208 Much cheaper.
14 Months -14% 12 Months Slightly more recent.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
191 fps -13%
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
183 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
173 fps -6%
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
182 fps Better lighting effects.
154 fps -18%
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
160 fps -6%

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]


The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $307Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $99
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $291AMD RX 480 $390Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $130
Intel Core i5-7600K $217Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $155
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback