Real World Speed
Performance profile from 71,397 user samples
55,508 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 54% Gigabyte(1458 22D0) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 54% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 547
15,889 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 48% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 48% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 547
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
64.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+13%
57 % -13%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
254 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+14%
222 fps -14%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
139 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+7%
130 fps -7%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
181 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+18%
153 fps -18%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+6%
119 fps -6%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
299 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+12%
266 fps -12%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
148 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+6%
139 fps -6%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
203 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+16%
175 fps -16%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
133 fps +5% 127 fps -5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+15%
140 fps -15%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.3 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+9%
84.9 fps -9%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.9 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+11%
47.6 fps -11%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.8 fps Much Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+45%
52.8 fps -45%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.1 fps Better Fallout 4 fps.
+25%
53 fps -25%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
92.4 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+26%
73.5 fps -26%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps Much Better DOTA 2 fps.
+31%
89.8 fps -31%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.8 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+15%
48.6 fps -15%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+5%
95.7 fps -5%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
202 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+5%
192 fps -5%
Market Share
Based on 5,444,721 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.44 % Hugely higher market share.
+243%
0.42 % -243%
Value
Value For Money
51.9 % -60% 83.2 % Much better value.
+60%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
146 % Much more popular.
+51%
97 % -51%
Price
Price (score)
$508 -59% $208 Much cheaper.
+59%
Age
Newest
16 Months -12% 14 Months Slightly more recent.
+12%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+11%
193 fps -11%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
185 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+5%
176 fps -5%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
185 fps Better lighting effects.
+16%
160 fps -16%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
170 fps +4% 163 fps -4%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $299Nvidia GTX 1070 $386Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $508Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $263Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $920SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback