Real World Speed
Performance profile from 47,947 user samples
20,259 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Gigabyte(1458 22E9) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 47% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 48th / 586
27,688 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% XFX(1682 9295)
Worst Bench: 54% Sapphire(174B E285)
Poor: 54% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 586
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.6 % 62.7 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+11%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
221 fps 245 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+11%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+9%
119 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
152 fps 155 fps +2%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
120 fps 168 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+40%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
261 fps 281 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+8%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+7%
131 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
175 fps +1% 173 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
128 fps 186 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+45%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
139 fps 149 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+7%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88 fps +4% 84.6 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+8%
44.5 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.1 fps 61.5 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+25%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
51.5 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+13%
45.5 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
76.9 fps +2% 75.1 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
48.4 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+8%
44.7 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.6 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+9%
86.4 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
153 fps 160 fps +4%
Market Share
Based on 8,352,065 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.26 % 0.3 % Higher market share.
+15%
Value
Value For Money
82.7 % Much better value.
+40%
59.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
99 % More popular.
+19%
83 %
Price
Price (score)
$208 Much cheaper.
+48%
$399
Age
Newest
20 Months Much more recent.
+63%
54 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
193 fps 213 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
177 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+7%
165 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
157 fps 187 fps Better lighting effects.
+19%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
161 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+8%
149 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $300Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $137
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $158
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback