Real World Speed
Performance profile from 183,106 user samples
139,730 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% XFX(1682 9480)
Worst Bench: 45% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 45% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 58th / 625
43,376 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 48% Gigabyte(1458 2290) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 41% MSI(1462 3081)
Poor: 41% Great: 48%
SPEED RANK: 70th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
52.3 % Faster effective speed.
45 %
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
180 fps 180 fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Faster multi rendering.
121 fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
191 fps Faster NBody calculation.
163 fps
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
214 fps +4% 205 fps
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
129 fps
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
176 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
155 fps Slightly Better CSGO Fps.
147 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
93 fps Better Fortnite Fps.
80 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
59 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
44 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
55 fps Better GTAV Fps.
43 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
160 fps Better LoL Fps.
130 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
95 fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
86 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
73 fps Slightly Better BF1 Fps.
65 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
53 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
46 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
126 fps Better DOTA 2 Fps.
99 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Much Better WoW Fps.
43 fps
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 fps Better WoT Fps.
80 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,764,118 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.71 % Hugely higher market share.
0.19 %
Value For Money
88.5 % Hugely better value.
26.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % Slightly more popular.
85 %
Price (score)
$140 Much cheaper.
41 Months Much more recent.
73 Months
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
181 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
161 fps
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
301 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
276 fps
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 180 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
171 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
149 fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
263 fps Slightly better texture detail.
248 fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
126 fps 169 fps Much faster complex splatting.

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition to better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support. [Jun '16 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback