Real World Speed
Performance profile from 27,483 user samples
13,942 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 45% XFX(1682 9470)
Poor: 45% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 548
13,541 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Asus(1043 046C)
Worst Bench: 52% Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 52% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 24th / 548
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
56.1 % -20% 67.4 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
218 fps -24% 270 fps Better texture detail.
+24%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
129 fps +5% 123 fps -5%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
151 fps -15% 174 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+15%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
119 fps -45% 173 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+45%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
265 fps -15% 305 fps Better peak texture detail.
+15%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
140 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+6%
132 fps -6%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
175 fps -7% 187 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+7%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
127 fps -46% 185 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+46%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
84.9 fps -1% 86 fps +1%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
47.6 fps -11% 53 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+11%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
73.5 fps -18% 86.4 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+18%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
192 fps -15% 220 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+15%
Market Share
Based on 5,826,333 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.38 % Much higher market share.
+73%
0.22 % -73%
Value
Value For Money
81.9 % Much better value.
+59%
51.5 % -59%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % More popular.
+24%
79 % -24%
Price
Price (score)
$208 Much cheaper.
+62%
$549 -62%
Age
Newest
15 Months Much more recent.
+69%
49 Months -69%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
193 fps -17% 225 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+17%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
178 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+7%
166 fps -7%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
155 fps -28% 199 fps Better lighting effects.
+28%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
160 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+5%
152 fps -5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $189SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback