Real World Speed
Performance profile from 342,835 user samples
85,529 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Asus(1043 04FB)
Worst Bench: 51% AMD(1002 0B37)
Poor: 51% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 590
257,306 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% MSI(1462 3160)
Worst Bench: 51% Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 51% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 38th / 590
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
63.6 % +0% 63.5 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
252 fps Better texture detail.
+30%
194 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
138 fps 149 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
177 fps 182 fps +3%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
125 fps 125 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
293 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+31%
224 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
147 fps 163 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+11%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
203 fps 206 fps +1%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
132 fps 141 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps +1% 157 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.3 fps 95 fps +4%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
55.2 fps +4% 52.9 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
52.8 fps 61.2 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+16%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75.8 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+15%
66.1 fps
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.1 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+7%
60.8 fps
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.2 fps 95.7 fps +2%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps 125 fps +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.4 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+11%
49 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68.5 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+7%
64.1 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
102 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+14%
89.5 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
190 fps +2% 186 fps
Market Share
Based on 8,830,466 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1 % 3.48 % Hugely higher market share.
+248%
Value
Value For Money
72.8 % Better value.
+15%
63.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
149 % Much more popular.
+31%
114 %
Price
Price (score)
$300 Cheaper.
+19%
$370
Age
Newest
23 Months Much more recent.
+48%
44 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
215 fps 227 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+6%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
182 fps 196 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+8%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
182 fps 197 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+8%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
169 fps 174 fps +3%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback