Real World Speed
Performance profile from 696,799 user samples
246,289 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% PowerColor(148C 2378)
Worst Bench: 47% Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
Poor: 47% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 53rd / 621
450,510 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 54% Asus(1043 852E) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 44% MSI(1462 3160)
Poor: 44% Great: 54%
SPEED RANK: 61st / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
54.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
49.8 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
282 fps Much better texture detail.
+45%
195 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps 151 fps +3%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
209 fps Slightly faster NBody calculation.
+14%
184 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
131 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+6%
124 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
321 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+47%
219 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
155 fps 159 fps +3%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
229 fps Slightly faster peak NBody calculation.
+14%
201 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
139 fps +1% 137 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
146 fps 156 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+7%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
93 fps 94 fps +1%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Slightly Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+8%
63 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+6%
53 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
145 fps 157 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+8%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99 fps +2% 97 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
72 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+15%
62 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
62 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+28%
48 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
124 fps +3% 120 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
184 fps 200 fps Slightly Better Minecraft fps.
+9%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+7%
63 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
95 fps 99 fps +4%
Market Share
Based on 19,395,153 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.21 % Much higher market share.
+37%
2.34 %
Value
Value For Money
74.8 % Hugely better value.
+153%
29.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
118 % Slightly more popular.
+15%
103 %
Price
Price (score)
$173 Much cheaper.
+57%
$399
Age
Newest
28 Months Much more recent.
+53%
59 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
227 fps +4% 218 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
192 fps +1% 190 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
203 fps +5% 194 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
179 fps +2% 175 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 970 is a game changer in terms of performance per watt and value for money. The GTX 970 is based on Nvidia's ground-breaking Maxwell architecture which delivers considerable clock for clock performance gains over Kepler, its predecessor. Comparing the GTX 970 and 780 Ti shows that the two cards offer comparable performance yet the new GTX 970 costs nearly half as much! Unsurprisingly Nvidia are discontinuing the 780 Ti as it's now largely redundant. These price to performance gains typically occur once or twice a decade and although the new Maxwell architecture will improve down the line with the release of the Ti/Titan versions, at the moment the 970 offers the best value for money on the market by miles. Since this summary was originally written AMD have slashed prices and older Nvidia models (780/780 Ti/770) have also been hugely discounted. See the latest value for money rankings here[Jul '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $173Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback