Real World Speed
Performance profile from 264,638 user samples
28,584 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 58% Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 58% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 584
236,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% PNY(196E 119F)
Worst Bench: 63% MSI(1462 3283)
Poor: 63% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 584
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
69.4 % 71.4 % +3%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
278 fps Much better texture detail.
+31%
212 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
143 fps 147 fps +3%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
199 fps 207 fps +4%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
130 fps 163 fps Faster complex splatting.
+25%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
316 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+31%
242 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
154 fps 166 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+8%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
219 fps 227 fps +4%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
138 fps 178 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+29%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
179 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+10%
162 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
99.7 fps +0% 99.4 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.2 fps 61.3 fps Slightly Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+9%
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65.1 fps 67.3 fps +3%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
69.8 fps 73.6 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+5%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
66.1 fps 72.8 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+10%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
91.1 fps 99.9 fps Slightly Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+10%
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps 135 fps Slightly Better DOTA 2 fps.
+10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
63.6 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+9%
58.3 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82.3 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+8%
76 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96.4 fps 108 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+12%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
159 fps 196 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+23%
Market Share
Based on 8,298,007 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.93 % 5.78 % Hugely higher market share.
+522%
Value
Value For Money
74.8 % 83.5 % Slightly better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
105 % 162 % Much more popular.
+54%
Price
Price (score)
$328 $290 Slightly cheaper.
+11%
Age
Newest
12 Months Much more recent.
+43%
21 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
229 fps 251 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+10%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
192 fps 214 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+11%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
201 fps 225 fps Slightly better lighting effects.
+12%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
178 fps 196 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+10%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 580 is released this week and is AMD’s latest flagship GPU based on second generation Polaris architecture. For all intents and purposes it is a refresh of the RX 480 released just 10 months prior. Modifications to the architecture have yielded improved performance per wattage and increased clock speeds of around 10% for base and around 5% for boost. The RX 580 will come with either 4GB or 8GB of high-bandwidth GDDR5 memory. Exact pricing for this mid-range chip remains to be seen, but the RX 500 series is likely to cannibalize sales of AMD’s 400 series. Performance wise, the RX 580 is in direct competition with NVIDIA’s popular GTX 1060 6GB which in now 9 months old. Perhaps after last year’s ill timed head to head release of the RX 480 and the faster but similarly priced GTX 1060 (a standoff which NVIDIA seem to have won based on market share), AMD are attempting to draw back some market share with the newer, slightly upgraded RX 580. The upcoming release of the 500 series comes ahead of AMD’s Vega architecture, for which specification and pricing details are not yet public but which will is expected to yield a significant jump in performance compared to Polaris. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s third 16 nm Pascal based GPU. It follows last month’s release of the higher end GTX 1070 and 1080. The 1060 has a TDP of 120 Watts and its aftermarket variants are available right away alongside the reference Founders edition. Comparing the GTX 1060 and 970 shows that although the 1060 leads by 12% it is also currently more expensive. Nvidia rushed the release of the GTX 1060 to help retain market share that may otherwise have gone to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 480. Comparing the RX 480 and GTX 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 12%. Due to better hardware compatibility, the RX 480 is able to match the 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, but that all depends on where prices settle. [Jul '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best gaming performance - Effective Speed measures performance for modern 3D games.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on 3D gaming performance and price.
  • Raw speed comparison - Raw speed readings.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $135
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $190SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback