Real World Speed
Performance profile from 449,622 user samples
91,676 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% AMD(1002 6B76)
Worst Bench: 77% AMD(1002 6B76)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 82nd / 714
357,946 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 174% Gigabyte(1458 37BB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 128% Asus(1043 8667)
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
86.6 % 156 % Much faster effective speed.
+80%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
111 fps 209 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+88%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
108 fps 208 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+93%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
92.3 fps 257 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+178%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
132 fps 211 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+60%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
122 fps 239 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+96%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
114 fps 308 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+170%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
95.4 fps 286 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+200%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
143 fps 240 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+68%
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
223 Fps 263 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+18%
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
121 Fps 197 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+62%
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps 137 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+32%
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps 140 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+59%
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
194 Fps 278 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+43%
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
127 Fps 139 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+9%
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
97 Fps 147 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+51%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
88 Fps 173 Fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+97%
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
202 Fps 303 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+50%
Market Share
Based on 67,463,182 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 0.72 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,500%
Value
Value For Money
51.3 % 83.6 % Much better value.
+63%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 72 % Much more popular.
+36%
Price
Price (score)
$400 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
$441
Age
Newest
80 Months 67 Months More recent.
+16%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
197 fps 268 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+36%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
78.4 fps 184 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+135%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
178 fps 231 fps Better texture detail.
+30%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
75.8 fps 163 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+115%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback