Real World Speed
Performance profile from 83,467 user samples
52,212 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Gigabyte(1458 373A) 3GB
Worst Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 3724)
Poor: 61% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 549
31,255 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% MSI(1462 2015)
Worst Bench: 60% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 60% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 549
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
67.1 % +2% 66 % -2%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
193 fps -33% 256 fps Much better texture detail.
+33%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
146 fps Faster multi rendering.
+16%
126 fps -16%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
195 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+20%
163 fps -20%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
155 fps -14% 177 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+14%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
218 fps -31% 286 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+31%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
155 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+17%
133 fps -17%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
210 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+22%
172 fps -22%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
168 fps -11% 187 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+11%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
160 fps -19% 189 fps Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+19%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
89.6 fps -4% 93.5 fps +4%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
60 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+29%
46.6 fps -29%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
54.4 fps -29% 70 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+29%
Fallout 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
68.6 fps Slightly Better Fallout 4 fps.
+12%
61 fps -12%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
88.8 fps -15% 102 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
49.2 fps -10% 53.9 fps Slightly Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+10%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
56.9 fps Slightly Better World of Warcraft fps.
+10%
51.9 fps -10%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
94.8 fps -7% 102 fps Slightly Better World of Tanks fps.
+7%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
181 fps +0% 180 fps -0%
Market Share
Based on 6,191,623 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.67 % Hugely higher market share.
+507%
0.44 % -507%
Value
Value For Money
100 % Much better value.
+34%
74.7 % -34%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
87 % -8% 94 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Price
Price (score)
$200 Much cheaper.
+34%
$304 -34%
Age
Newest
16 Months Much more recent.
+47%
30 Months -47%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
225 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+5%
214 fps -5%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
191 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+14%
167 fps -14%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
205 fps +4% 198 fps -4%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
176 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+12%
157 fps -12%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3GB GTX 1060 follows last month’s release of the 6GB GTX 1060. The 3GB variant not only has reduced memory but Nvidia have also disabled 10 percent of the processing cores from 1,280 down to 1,152. There is no reference edition of the 3GB 1060 but the partner cards are already available (at launch). Comparing the GTX 6GB 1060 and 3GB 1060 shows that the 6GB 1060 leads, on average, by 7% but it is also currently 15% more expensive. The GTX 1060 is Nvidia’s answer to AMD’s new Polaris based RX 470. Comparing the RX 470 and 3GB 1060 shows that for pre DX12 games the 1060 edges ahead by 11%. The RX 470 is able to match the 3GB 1060 in DX12 games but this will remain a corner case until most games are optimized for DX12 (likely to take several years). The 3GB 1060 has the potential to become a hugely successful card, especially if prices drop below $200. [Sep '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 290. At the current price levels of $329, the R9 390 can't compete given that R9 290s can be had for around $260. The increased VRAM will rarely help even at ultra high resolutions and in any case, most 4K gamers are likely to seek more GPU power than the R9 390 has to offer. We have seen several samples of the R9 390 and they scored an effective speed of 88.5% which, as expected, matches the speeds seen on overclocked R9 290s. On the face of it purchasing an R9 290 at a discount and then manually overclocking will result in the same performance as an R9 390 but with a saving of around $70. [Jun '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2017 GPU Rankings.

Welcome to our graphics card comparison. We calculate effective 3D speed which measures performance for recent games. Effective speed is adjusted by cost to yield value for money. Calculated values don't always tell the whole picture so we check them against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors and more to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. Share your opinion by voting. [GPUPro]

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $135
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback